Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Planned State Department Layoffs

The U.S. State Department’s sweeping reorganization, which was set to cut thousands of jobs, has been halted after a federal judge broadened a previous injunction to cover the agency’s plans.

‍

On Friday, District Judge Susan Illston of California issued an updated order preventing the State Department from moving forward with layoffs. The ruling adds the agency explicitly under an existing injunction that already blocked most federal departments from carrying out workforce reductions tied to President Trump’s executive order on government downsizing.

‍

State Department Argued It Was a “Special Case”

‍

The Trump administration maintained that the State Department’s restructuring was unique. Officials argued that the plan was designed independently from Trump’s mandates, crafted solely under the direction of Secretary Marco Rubio. The Justice Department even suggested that because Illston’s initial order only addressed the president’s executive order and guidance from the Office of Management and Budget and Office of Personnel Management, the State Department should be exempt.

Illston rejected that argument. As of Friday’s order, State is barred from proceeding with any layoff notices.

‍

The U.S. State Department’s ambitious reorganization plan, which was set to eliminate approximately 3,400 jobs, has been halted following a decisive ruling by U.S. District Judge Susan Illston. This updated injunction blocks the department from moving forward with layoffs, extending a court order that paused federal workforce reductions tied to President Trump’s downsizing executive order.

‍

At Federal Pension Advisors, we understand that such developments can create uncertainty for federal employees planning their career and retirement futures. Our latest blog breaks down the complex legal battle surrounding these layoffs, clarifies what the court’s ruling means for affected employees, and explores the broader implications for federal workforce reorganization.

‍

Whether you are a civil service or foreign service employee at risk, or simply seeking to understand how these changes might impact your pension and retirement plans, our deep expertise will guide you through the evolving landscape of federal employment rights and protections.

‍

‍

Thousands of Jobs on the Line

‍

The blocked reorganization would have eliminated approximately 3,400 positions at the State Department, a significant reduction in force (RIF). Workers were bracing to receive notices within days or weeks had the court not stepped in. Justice Department lawyers previously indicated notices could have gone out as soon as this past Friday.

‍

The department, meanwhile, had been preparing employees for the cuts. Staff were recently instructed to update their resumes and personnel files steps commonly associated with reorganization and RIF processes to enable human resources to evaluate reassignments or separation packages.

‍

Legal Battle Escalates

‍

Illston’s injunction against broader federal workforce downsizing remains in effect and is now awaiting review by the Supreme Court, with a decision expected soon. The Ninth Circuit has already rejected the administration’s earlier attempt to challenge her ruling.

The State Department is not alone. Other agencies have likewise made preparations to move quickly on layoffs if the Supreme Court overturns the injunction.

‍

Broader Implications

‍

The plaintiffs unions, nonprofits, and municipal groups have also pressed for review of related agency cuts. For example, they sought to reverse probationary terminations at the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Judge Illston stopped short of that but directed the administration to provide HUD’s reorganization plan for further evaluation.

For now, State Department employees remain in limbo. While the injunction offers temporary protection, the final outcome rests with the nation’s highest court.

‍

FAQs

‍

Q1. Why did the judge block the Trump administration’s State Department layoffs?

‍

A federal judge ruled that the State Department’s reorganization fell under an injunction preventing federal agencies from workforce reductions tied to Trump’s executive order.

‍

Q2. How many layoffs were planned at the State Department?

‍

The State Department’s reorganization aimed to cut about 3,400 jobs, though some reports mentioned up to 2,000 layoffs in initial phases.

‍

Q3. Who was the judge that issued the ruling?

‍

The order was issued by U.S. District Judge Susan Illston of California, who expanded a previous injunction to specifically include the State Department.

‍

Q4. Does this ruling mean the layoffs are permanently blocked?

‍

No. The injunction is temporary. The case is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, which will decide whether agencies can proceed with reorganization plans.

‍